Evidence readers can inspect

Claims about credentials, speaking, products, and public service should identify what the source establishes. A personal account is labeled as such; a public listing does not prove delivery, adoption, results, or accreditation. Proposals and illustrative examples are distinct from completed work.

Podcast and synthetic media

Episode descriptions should distinguish interviews, commentary, narrated explainers, document summaries, and synthetic conversations. A named subject or quoted author is not necessarily a participant or endorser. Where voices or participation have not been checked, the format remains unverified.

For new or revised releases, confirmed synthetic voices should be disclosed in the description and opening audio. Source documents and actual contributors should be identified where permission allows. These standards do not mean every historical episode has already been reviewed; the podcast page describes the current review limits.

Personal health cases require review of sources, publication permission, and any clinical recommendations before being promoted as educational material. A disclaimer does not resolve inaccurate advice or missing consent.

Corrections

Send the page or episode link, the exact statement, and supporting evidence to doug@goodsamaritaninstitute.org. Please do not include private health or identity records in an initial request.

Material factual corrections should identify the affected claim, the correction, its supporting source, and the date applied. Preserve the original and record where copies need updating. Editing this site does not automatically update LinkedIn, podcast hosts, or syndicated material.

November 3, 2026 editorial review

This revision removes the disputed “M.S.” abbreviation pending institutional confirmation, distinguishes self-reported scientific participation from formal appointments, replaces confidence badges with evidence descriptions, and qualifies product and technical claims. Podcast entries now distinguish metadata checks from unverified voice production and participant information.

These changes narrow the claims to the evidence available. They do not establish that a degree is invalid, that anyone acted improperly, or that every episode uses synthetic voices.